VOTO 1: Swiss Popular Vote 25.09.2016 - D

Schweiz, 2016

Reference ID

ch.sidos.ddi.d.826.12471

Producer(s)

Anke Tresch (Leit.), Laura Scaperrotta, Lukas Lauener, Georg Lutz, Olivier Lipps, Florence Lebert, Thomas Milic, Daniel Kübler

Collections

VOTO

Metadata

DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Sep 19, 2019

Last modified

Sep 01, 2022

Page views

73431

Variable Groups

Variable group: Argumente für die Entscheidung

Variables 18

argu_1

Arg. pro 'OASIplus': adjustment is necessary because of rising living costs

argu_2

Arg. pro 'OASIplus': AHV needs to be strengthened because it is the safest incom

argu_3

Arg. pro 'OASIplus': women benefit most

argu_4

Arg. contra 'OASIplus': low income people hardly benefit

argu_5

Arg. contra 'OASIplus': not financially affordable

argu_6

Arg. contra 'OASIplus': no benefit for young people

argu_7

Arg. pro 'Green economy': the future belongs to environmentally friendly technol

argu_8

Arg. pro 'Green economy': pushes economy to protect environment

argu_9

Arg. pro 'Green economy': enforces durable products

argu_10

Arg. contra 'Green economy': new regulations, harms competitiveness

argu_11

Arg. contra 'Green economy': imposes lifestyle changes

argu_12

Arg. contra 'Green economy': products will become more expensive

argu_13

Arg. pro 'Intelligence Service Act': is needed to fight terrorism

argu_14

Arg. pro 'Intelligence Service Act': currently depending on foreign IS

argu_15

Arg. pro 'Intelligence Service Act': restriction of personal freedom is acceptab

argu_16

Arg. contra 'Intelligence Service Act': CH already has necessary means

argu_17

Arg. contra 'Intelligence Service Act': allows mass surveillance without reasona

argu_18

Arg. contra 'Intelligence Service Act': not compatible with basic rights

Back to Catalog