VOTO 5: Swiss Popular Vote 24.09.2017 - D

Schweiz, 2017 - 2019

Reference ID

ch.sidos.ddi.d.872.12471

Producer(s)

Anke Tresch (Leit.), Laura Scaperrotta, Lukas Lauener, Georg Lutz, Oliver Lipps, Florence Lebert, Thomas Milic, Daniel Kübler

Collections

VOTO

Metadata

DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Sep 20, 2019

Last modified

Sep 01, 2022

Page views

86076

Variable Groups

Variable group: Argumente für die Entscheidung

Variables 19

argu_1

Arg. pro 'Food security': guarantee food security for future generations

argu_2

Arg. pro 'Food security': support domestic food production

argu_3

Arg. contra 'Food security': unnecessary

argu_4

Arg. contra 'Food security': only serves to maintain subsidies and safeguard cla

argu_5

Arg. pro 'Pension reform': reduction of conversion rate necessary

argu_6

Arg. pro 'Pension reform': balanced compromise

argu_7

Arg. pro 'Pension reform': secure pensions until 2030

argu_8

Arg. pro 'Pension reform': better than no reform at all

argu_9

Arg. pro 'Pension reform': reduce gender equality in the second pillar

argu_10

Arg. pro 'Pension reform': necessary flexibilisation of retirement age

argu_11

Arg. pro 'Pension reform': social solution because small incomes benefit the mos

argu_12

Arg. contra 'Pension reform': retirement age at 67 inevitable in the long term

argu_13

Arg. contra 'Pension reform': 70CHF supplement only for new retirees introduces

argu_14

Arg. contra 'Pension reform': reform at the expense of young generation

argu_15

Arg. contra 'Pension reform': against retirement age at 65 for females as long a

argu_16

Arg. contra 'Pension reform': pseudo reform that does not resolve financial prob

argu_17

Arg. contra 'Pension reform': development instead of reconstruction leading incr

argu_18

Arg. contra 'Pension reform': development of first pillar based on scattergun ap

argu_19

Arg. contra 'Pension reform': VAT is an unsocial tax

Back to Catalog